|
ATLAS
- B u r e a u d ' é t u d e s
1. Maps and Organigrams
The geographical MAP is an analog device:
it claims to be a copy of the surrounding world. In this way it helps
us to orient ourselves, to find our way when we are lost, disoriented,
when we don't know where we are. It transforms space into a language
which, once learned, allows you to locate yourself in what it resembles.
The ORGANIGRAM, on the other hand, is a figurative rendering of social
space, with its actors (institutional, economic, social, religious,
personal) and its constitutive relations and interactions (administrative,
strategic, friendly, financial, religious, political, etc.). The figurative
rendering of ALL the planet's social relations, as they can be grasped
through the information documenting them, would ideally produce a
MAP of world social space. Such a map, sketched on the basis of the
relations constituting social space, can help to locate ourselves,
to know where we are and what's going on, indeed, to decide what to
do.
2. Governmental Cartography
The position of overlook adopted by the geographical map is permitted
by physical space, which can be flown over. Can the same be said of
the world's social space? To see social space from above would allow
you to act like a general, positioning and shifting his troops, triggering
affects, representations, perceptions (infowar, psywar). Constructing
strategies, carrying out coordinated tactical actions. To do this,
social actors would have to attain a state of fixity, or at least
sufficient permanency to be comparable to things. But unlike things,
social actors are moved by diverse forces, physical ones of course,
but above all psychological and informational forces. The map-organigram
of planetary power attempts to discover and describe the view from
above that makes it possible for a world government, or a given sector
of such a government, to organize coercion and to pursue its aims
thanks to or despite the chances offered by history. It renders flows
which can change direction or vanish.
3. Cartographies in Acts
Press services, like governments and transnational firms, define
orders of priority and importance for world events. Debate in public
space (and particularly the figure of the riot) is a struggle against
the monopoly on the representation of reality, on the production of
legitimate information. What kinds of antagonisms are opened up by
a cartography of the system of domination, by an identification of
hegemonic strategists and strategies? It is not only a matter here
of defining targets and sketching out necessary strategies or alliances,
the empty zones of possible movements. In other words, it is not a
matter of mimetically adopting the dominant GAZE. One antagonism consists
in leaving behind the GOVERNMENTAL (or if you prefer, spinal) approach
to cartography. Social space is shot through with antagonisms; therefore
several maps confront each other with their batteries of arguments.
These multiple worlds need to be accounted for, through multiple and
crisscrossing viewpoints. Each map does not have the same way of determining
what makes or unravels meaning. Thus the multitudes are cartographies
in acts, operators of generic definitions, manifestations of planetary
affects that continually overflow all the attempts to measure and
symbolize them.
|
|