

Previous
Next
Index
Thread
Re: @ Dahlman the hypocrite - flameback

-
To: Public Netbase NewsAgent
-
Subject: Re: @ Dahlman the hypocrite - flameback
-
From: rackjite@worldnet.att.net (Rack Jite)
-
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 17:47:50 -0700 (PDT)
-
Article: talk.politics.misc.414149
-
Score: 100

Comes Rack Jite's conservatively incorrect reply to whatever it was
kjackson@cs.tamu.edu (Keith E Jackson) was saying...
The word "Netscab" was coined specifically by ecliptic@ to define
Texas A&M University employee Keith E. Jackson, who through a
relentlessness campaign of lies and propaganda has taken the term
*pathological liar* to heights never before imagined. Like his
net-friend Patrick L. Humphrey, Mr. Jackson is an abject loser
whose on-line existence for most of two years is concerned with
little other than lying and squealing on any liberal who stands up
and kicks it back at the humongous herd of right-wing/libertarian
creepy-crawlers on Usenet. Get a quick look at this little snot at:
http://www.c2.org/~ccrj/jackson.htm
##jiteautoresponder##42~~9##
---------------------------------------------------
---
*In article <31d29b03.5043456@netnews.worldnet.att.net>,
*David Dahlman <rackjite@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
*>The word "Netscab" was coined specifically by ecliptic@ to define
*>Texas A&M University employee Keith E. Jackson,
*
*Dahlman revises history once again. The word was coined by his
alter-ego
*to describe those people who complained to administrators about
Usenet
*postings. For months, Dahlman whined that he was "one complaint
away"
*from being kicked off the server blackbox.com, crying that "Netscabs"
*were trying to censor him by getting him kicked off. Of course, this
*was all a hoax. He left of his own free will after milking this
*"poor me" game for all it was worth.
*
*But the truly remarkable thing is that no one came to embody this
quaint
*little term more than Dahlman himself. Not only did he whine and
complain
*to other's administrators about their Usenet postings (for reasons as
*trivial as the "right-wing" content of their messages) but he chose
to
*target those who posted from company or university accounts. While
*grandstanding as the champion of Internet Privacy, he blackmailed
these
*people with threats to get them in trouble with their bosses or
schools,
*unless they shut up. He came up with one story after another to try
and
*excuse this behavior : he was really just trying to get people who
used
*"free accounts" to move to commercial ISPs so they could pay for
their
*Usenet feed like everyone else, he was trying to protect the name of
the
*company or university from being harmed by their employees and
students,
*he was justified because some people (not those he actually attacked,
*mind you) did similar things to him, etc..
*
*>who through a
*>relentlessness campaign of lies and propaganda has taken the term
*>*pathological liar* to heights never before imagined.
*



