jmanso19@skypoint.com (Jim Manson) wrote: >raych@sirius.com (Raymond A. Chamberlin) wrote: >>jmanso19@skypoint.com (Jim Manson) wrote: >> >>>raych@sirius.com (Raymond A. Chamberlin) wrote: >> ....................... >> >> I'll try to find >>something on this at some library. Don't think I'll run into Bill >>there. >> >a non-answer Well, clearly a shelving. >> ..................................... >> >> I can >>remodel my own home (if I have one, but I don't) without being >>licensed to do it (with maybe having to have certain items done by >>licensed contractors), yet I can't just throw up any kind of shack I >>might choose to. In a city, particularly, there are all kinds of >>regulations I must abide by, but I'm not required to be licensed in >>the process, and, unless there is corruption, these regulations are >>regularly enforced under municipal and county codes. All kinds of >>people in the whole city and/or county are involved in determining >>these codes, though not all equally. >Wrong- you can't simply pass regulations that effect them without >some form of licensing. Wrong; I'm right. I gave an example. The whole criminal codes of any jurisdiction are also exactly those. What is your tax-fraud civil enforement if it is not those, assuming you (and if not you, some colleague) handle individuals as well as licensed businesses? >If you want to write a proposed legal >basis for that go ahead- I'll be interested in seeing it. They might pay you for that, but not me. >Comparing it to municipal building codes is specious. Saying my comparison is specious, is simply saying you elevate physicians to some untouchable plane--or denigrate building construction to the pits. Don't you ever catch MDs at tax fraud? Only all the time. >> .......................... >> >>can you not find it ludicrous that >>>>*licensed* MDs in the US are fully permitted to practice any and all >>>>kinds of medicine legally, although not formally or otherwise trained >>>>in whatever specialty/ies they choose to practice? >> >>>Depends on how you define that. In general it's not correct >> >>In *general*, it *is* correct; I don't know about certain powers >>surgeons have acquired within the profession but which are not state >>statutes. >> >Maybe not in your state- they are in Minnesota. >>>in that >>>a GP is not allowed to perform most types of specialized surgery, >>>period. Hospitals frequently revoke privileges >>