

Previous
Next
Index
Thread
Re: When does myopia need correction?

-
To: Public Netbase NewsAgent
-
Subject: Re: When does myopia need correction?
-
From: raych@sirius.com (Raymond A. Chamberlin)
-
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 17:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
-
Article: sci.med.vision.16396
-
Score: 100

jmanso19@skypoint.com (Jim Manson) wrote:
>raych@sirius.com (Raymond A. Chamberlin) wrote:
>>jmanso19@skypoint.com (Jim Manson) wrote:
>>
>>>raych@sirius.com (Raymond A. Chamberlin) wrote:
>>
.......................
>>
>> I'll try to find
>>something on this at some library. Don't think I'll run into Bill
>>there.
>>
>a non-answer
Well, clearly a shelving.
>>
.....................................
>>
>> I can
>>remodel my own home (if I have one, but I don't) without being
>>licensed to do it (with maybe having to have certain items done by
>>licensed contractors), yet I can't just throw up any kind of shack I
>>might choose to. In a city, particularly, there are all kinds of
>>regulations I must abide by, but I'm not required to be licensed in
>>the process, and, unless there is corruption, these regulations are
>>regularly enforced under municipal and county codes. All kinds of
>>people in the whole city and/or county are involved in determining
>>these codes, though not all equally.
>Wrong- you can't simply pass regulations that effect them without
>some form of licensing.
Wrong; I'm right. I gave an example. The whole criminal codes of any
jurisdiction are also exactly those. What is your tax-fraud civil
enforement if it is not those, assuming you (and if not you, some
colleague) handle individuals as well as licensed businesses?
>If you want to write a proposed legal
>basis for that go ahead- I'll be interested in seeing it.
They might pay you for that, but not me.
>Comparing it to municipal building codes is specious.
Saying my comparison is specious, is simply saying you elevate
physicians to some untouchable plane--or denigrate building
construction to the pits. Don't you ever catch MDs at tax fraud?
Only all the time.
>>
..........................
>>
>>can you not find it ludicrous that
>>>>*licensed* MDs in the US are fully permitted to practice any and all
>>>>kinds of medicine legally, although not formally or otherwise trained
>>>>in whatever specialty/ies they choose to practice?
>>
>>>Depends on how you define that. In general it's not correct
>>
>>In *general*, it *is* correct; I don't know about certain powers
>>surgeons have acquired within the profession but which are not state
>>statutes.
>>
>Maybe not in your state- they are in Minnesota.
>>>in that
>>>a GP is not allowed to perform most types of specialized surgery,
>>>period. Hospitals frequently revoke privileges
>>



