

Previous
Next
Index
Thread
RE: BEATLE CLUES: A NEW T

-
To: Public Netbase NewsAgent
-
Subject: RE: BEATLE CLUES: A NEW T
-
From: joseph.nagarya@mcb-bbs.pn.com (JOSEPH NAGARYA)
-
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 17:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
-
Article: rec.music.beatles.145656
-
Score: 100

BBG>From: Bob Grubb <bobgrubb@ewol.com>
BBG>Subject: Re: Beatle Clues: A New Theory
BBG>Date: Sun, 23 Jun 1996 01:28:22 +0000
BBG>Message-ID: <31CC9DB6.3E71@ewol.com>
BBG>I see. I guess I was mistaken. Thank you for informing me about how the
BBG>Beatles got their name, I must have missed that in the more than 30 years
BBG>of Beatle literature I have been exposed to. 8)
Me too. I wonder how that happened?
Perhaps they were actually called "The Old Brown Shoes"?
BBG>What about the "we ran out of red carnations" explanation?
A bit of a stretch. But methinks a "teaser" intended to sell
books.
BBG>Perhaps this quote, similar to the Leary quote (in an uncanny sort of
BBG>way), is more true...
BBG>"Some of the newer Beatle songs... show an acute awareness of the
BBG>principles of rhythm and brainwashing. Meither Lennon nor McCartney were
BBG>world-beaters in school, nor have they had technical training in music.
BBG>For them to have written some of their songs is like someone who had not
BBG>had physics or math inventing the A-bomb...
BBG> [or one who has not studied Egyptology being able to interpret arcane
BBG>symbology 8) ]
BBG>"Because of its technical excellence it is possible that this music is put
BBG>together by behavioral scientist in some 'think tank'... I have no idea
BBG>whether the Beatles know what they are doing or whether they are being
BBG>used by some enormously sophisticated people, but it really doesn't make
BBG>any difference. Its results that count, and the Beatles are the leading
BBG>pied pipers creating promiscuity, an epidemic of drugs,youth class-
BBG>consciousness, and an atmosphere for social revolution."
BBG> -Dr. Joseph Crow, billed as America's 'Number One Expert on Musical
BBG>Subversion' by John Birch Society members and right-wing Christian
BBG>evangelists.
BBG>To these people, who pointed up the same ideas as Leary, the whole
BBG>behavioral modification program was a Communist Conspiricy. Their
BBG>suspicions grew when 'Back In The USSR' was released.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. I remember all that. Made _me_ lean _away_ from
JBS, et al., _toward_ that about which they knew nothing, but so
furiosuly (and terrifiedly) bashed.
BBG>Today's changes in Eastern Europe, and the fans (now definitely over '30')
BBG>who left hippy-dom and entered yuppie-dom (thereby becoming perhaps the
BBG>greatest capitalistic consumers of all time), show in retrospect the
BBG>Beatles did a lousy job of promoting Communism.
Except that Yuppies were the antithesis of Hippy, therefore did
not originate as Hippies. They were of the same generation --
but were those who _mocked_ Hippies as (among other things)
"unrealistic".
BBG>Is the quote above suggesting the same mechanism of Beatle influence on
BBG>culture, or am I again short on research?
Depends upon what you're saying. Care to try it in English --
sans expectations of ESP in others?
BBG>Would it be offbase to consider that there is more meaning to this mere
BBG>group that managed to change the world through their music? This is not a
BBG>novel new concept. Emil Nauman commented on the powerful effect of music
BBG>on Greek culture:
Nope. But it _would_ be offbase to suggest -- or insist -- that
it was all some sort of _conscious_ intent. (Jungian notions might
apply; but that doesn't presume _conscious awarness_.) That is
the problem with all the (paranoid) "conspiracy" suggestions.
Regardless whether you have more academic background than all the
lesser peons who do exactly the same thing (albeit less consci-
ously).



